Public Comments

Leave it the hell alone.

I strongly support the following guidelines requested by the Wintu Audubon Society. We need very careful development along the river corridor. Thank you.
1. Establish adequately sized and protected no-disturbance buffers for all bird and wildlife habitat areas (including riparian zones and including areas for which riparian values can be restored). Establish buffer zone sizes based on best available science tailored to the location, not guesswork.
2. Support the restoration of degraded riparian areas such as the area between the Sundial Bridge and the Rodeo Grounds, and the gravel pits and inundated borrow areas at Cypress Square.
3. Complete a comprehensive inventory of all bird and wildlife habitats and the species they support. (This has never been done, in spite of a series of City development decisions which should have required it, including the Museum, the Bridge, the Hotel and planned improvements to the boat launch area at the Rodeo Grounds. Additionally, the Plan Consultant does not have an adequate budget item for this recommended task.)
4. Limit public access improvements and require only low impact trails near riparian areas (paved trails require wider footprint of vegetation removal and cause greater pollutant runoff).
5. Limit invasive lighting and increased noise after dusk.
These are the primary issues Wintu Audubon has raised in the past. PLEASE let the City, the Coalition, and the Consultant know your values, concerns, and preferences by filing an email or in-person comment.

I would like the Coalition to include in the vision for the project specific ways to protect the Garden Tract neighborhood from high volumes of traffic. I would like the vision to specify that no City-owned land be offered for sale to avoid having to declare the land "surplus," thus avoiding the possibility that low-income housing would be developed in environmentally sensitive areas. I would like the vision to specify that no existing housing, including the trailer park next to the river off Park Marina, will be removed to avoid contributing to homelessness.

Dear Redding Riverfront Team,
As a resident of Redding/Anderson since 1944 I would like to provide a few comments on how I view the area under discussion...The Specific Plan for the Riverfront within the City Limits of ReddingCA.
1. First and foremost, please keep in mind that the 100 Year Flood Plan should be part of, and adhered to, for any vision and design.
2. It seems that the City of Redding and the Kutras Family need to sit down and work out an agreement so that either the City or the Kutras Family are basically the entity that goes forward.
3. As you ponder over many suggestions and desires for the Riverfront Plan, keep in mind that it's Mother Nature that will have the final say in regards to developments that could be subject to climate conditions over the next few years.
4. As far as development...e.g. motels, entertainment, housing, etc. Again, I feel the Riverfront Plan should have the least impact on the river. Include a designated area from the river to park Marina as a No Development Zone. Keeping it as natural as possible. This would give the citizens and tourists the most feasible use of this pristine area. {Similar to the area from No. Market St bridge and going north along the river and river trail}
5. Yes to minimal public art/sculptures/walking exercise areas, etc. No to commercial entities such as...Golf, food kiosks, noisy attractions.
6. The area that comprises the Civic, Sheraton, Rodeo grounds and Sundial Bridge are sufficient as a retail & commercial development area. With some attention to the Rodeo grounds and the Sundial Bridge maintenance; this area, for the most part, sufficiently supports the community and visitors needs in a well managed manner.
Thank you for your time and considerations,

Jeremy,

I had a few days to think about the meeting on Monday. The most important comments were by the public and not the coalition. I assume in the next meeting, the idea board will be summarized as a starting point. Please include these comments made by the public:

1. The theme should be centered around the river and be made accessible to lower income families. As of 2020, the median income in Redding was $28K for individuals and $56K for households.
2. The tribal voice has to be heard.
3. This is not an urban waterfront like San Antonio (pop. 1.4 million).
4. There are traffic issues in the Garden Tract. The most direct route from Park Marina and Turtle Bay to downtown is through the Garden Tract via South, Placer, and Yuba Street.

Lastly, please provide a list of public vs. private lands.

If you could pass this onto MIG so it's on the next presentation, that would be great.

As a Redding resident for 44 years, I care deeply about the future development of the riverfront area. I attended the introductory project meeting in August at the civic auditorium and the Oct. 9 meeting at City Hall Council Chambers.

I think the highest priority in considering the future of the riverfront area is preserving the natural environment so the trees, vegetation, and animals on land and in the river can thrive. The big mistake would be to over-develop the area and negatively impact the natural environment: it would destroy what makes the riverfront so enjoyable.

To achieve the continuing health of the natural environment, I think environmental preservation should be the first goal of the Riverfront Plan. Proposed development projects can then be weighed as to their effect on what the plants and animals need to thrive. However, often planning is done with the proposed development as first priority and ""mitigations"" are identified as a sub-category. The problem: ""mitigation"" means to make something less bad; but it's still not good for the plants/animals, just not as bad. The priority should be a thriving natural environment as a primary goal. If we lose the health of the environment, we lose everything!

With this goal in mind, I think the Turtle Bay area should get NO expanded commercial development. Enhancing the visitor experience can come with additional or enhanced interpretive features that will help people appreciate and support the natural environment and the history and cultural values of the Indigenous peoples who lived there.

Commercial development is more appropriate for the Park Marina Drive area where the closed commercial developments are located. Again, the natural environment should be protected all along the riverfront.

Sincerely,

Good evening,
I am the Director of a Community Non Profit Group called Friends of the Redding Eagles.

I have been walking & riding the TB Bird Sanctuary trails since 1993. I met my husband walking those trails & we raised our son on those trails, too. So I am very familiar with that area & with much of the wildlife who inhabit that riparian area.

Our Community Group has some serious concerns about the upcoming development of this area & how these changes will impact the nesting Redding Bald Eagles, Ospreys, Great Horned Owls, Red-tailed Hawks. I know the locations of all of these nests because I have been monitoring the raptors in the area for many years.

Our Friends of the Redding Eagles Community Group does monthly Tours open to the public on the TB Bird Sanctuary Trail & along the Dana to Downtown Trail. Our FORE Group also works closely with the City of Redding to keep these areas safe & clean for the wildlife in the area. We report transient camps & pick up trash daily along the Dana to Downtown Trail which we adopted with United Shasta in 2019.

Our group would like to request that before any work is done that you complete a comprehensive survey of all of the Wildlife Species in the TB Bird Sanctuary area. This way you will know exactly which species are inhabiting the area & the population of each of those species. That will allow you to monitor any & all impacts the construction & development in the area might be having on the wildlife. Then you can make adjustments accordingly.

We do support your efforts to make much needed improvements to the area, but we want to make sure the impact to wildlife is as minimal as possible.

We are hopeful that the improvements will deter & displace the transients who have taken up residence in the Rodeo Grounds & Turtle Bay Area. We have witnessed severe impact to the wildlife & their habitat ever since 2010 when the Dana to Downtown Trail was opened.

I would be glad to consult with you & share any information you need about the Bald Eagles & other wildlife in the TB Bird Sanctuary.

Thank you for your time & attention to this matter.
Sincerely,

There is always talk of making money bu encouraging development. I'm sure there have been
developers in NYC who had their eyes on Central Park.but the value of surrounding properties depends on there being a central park. The River Front ampitheatre is so small and the trail deadends at the foot of the cemetery. For elders taking a lovely stroll in the skade it would
be wonderful to have a gradual, switch back trail that went up to and thrhas ough the cemetery.

Multipurpose is not the goal for these special riverfront park areas. Separate into zones and totally preserve the riparian areas. Park View Marina could afford more river access for families. Perhaps this zone is one that can stand redevelopment.
The Auditorium is a failed enterprise. Figure out how to get rid of it and let it go back to park.

Dear Committee Members,

Without going into great detail, as a resident of Redding I am opposed to any development in the Bird Sanctuary area of Turtle Bay. Isn't Turtle Bay supposed to be an educational/environmental oasis in the middle of our beautiful city. Developing the riverfront for commercial purposes seems to be a land grab by somebody seeking financial gain. Does it always have to be about money? Joni Michell said it best, ""..you don't know what you've got till it's gone""
Do not develop this riverfront sanctuary.

Sincerely,

Hello-

Instead of developing more paved pathways and buildings, why not create a beautiful natural corridor that echos a riparian corridor?

Instead of building expensive and exclusive buildings only wealthy people can access, why not maintain a natural heritage that is irreplaceable?

There are way too many empty retail buildings, and the expensive downtown development is a heat island that was never meant to attract the humble folk of this area.

Residents in this area walk the river trail by the Sundial bridge because it is a natural treasure.

It is the living river, the fish and birds, the large oaks, the mountain views that need to be enshrined and preserved.

Thank you,

Hello,

I have been watching birds in the Turtle Bay Bird Sanctuary for the past 32 years. I am very concerned that the riverfront may be forever damaged by developers who would like to place noisy, invasive, ""attractions"" (restaurants, ziplines, amphitheaters for entertainment, etc.) in the area that would ruin the peace and natural beauty of the site. It is currently a lovely place for any citizen to use free of charge to relax and rejuvenate. It would be a terrible shame to have that destroyed along with the habitat for the nearly 200 different species that have been recorded there on eBird.

As a member of the Wintu Audubon Society, I support the following issues that the conservation group has proposed to being key to preserving the values fo the riparian resources and bird and wildlife diversity present on the Redding Riverfront:

1. Establish adequately sized and protected no-disturbance buffers for all bird and wildlife habitat areas (including riparian zones and including areas for which riparian values can be restored). Establish buffer zone sizes based on best available science tailored to the location, not guesswork.
2. Support the restoration of degraded riparian areas such as the area between the Sundial Bridge and the Rodeo Grounds, and the gravel pits and inundated borrow areas at Cypress Square.
3. Complete a comprehensive inventory of all bird and wildlife habitats and the species they support. (This has never been done, in spite of a series of City development decisions which should have required it, including the Museum, the Bridge, the Hotel and planned improvements to the boat launch area at the Rodeo Grounds. Additionally, the Plan Consultant does not have an adequate budget item for this recommended task.)
4. Limit public access improvements and require only low impact trails near riparian areas (paved trails require wider footprint of vegetation removal and cause greater pollutant runoff).
5. Limit invasive lighting and increased noise after dusk.

Thank you for your serious consideration,

"I strongly support the following guidelines requested by the Wintu Audubon Society. We need very careful development along the river corridor. Thank you. Judy Salter
1. Establish adequately sized and protected no-disturbance buffers for all bird and wildlife habitat areas (including riparian zones and including areas for which riparian values can be restored). Establish buffer zone sizes based on best available science tailored to the location, not guesswork.
2. Support the restoration of degraded riparian areas such as the area between the Sundial Bridge and the Rodeo Grounds, and the gravel pits and inundated borrow areas at Cypress Square.
3. Complete a comprehensive inventory of all bird and wildlife habitats and the species they support. (This has never been done, in spite of a series of City development decisions which should have required it, including the Museum, the Bridge, the Hotel and planned improvements to the boat launch area at the Rodeo Grounds. Additionally, the Plan Consultant does not have an adequate budget item for this recommended task.)
4. Limit public access improvements and require only low impact trails near riparian areas (paved trails require wider footprint of vegetation removal and cause greater pollutant runoff).
5. Limit invasive lighting and increased noise after dusk.
These are the primary issues Wintu Audubon has raised in the past. PLEASE let the City, the Coalition, and the Consultant know your values, concerns, and preferences by filing an email or in-person comment."

Please save our Rodeo Grounds and the wildlife of the river there

I have been personally involved with the Redding Rodeo for more than thirty years. My husband has been a member for 30 years, I have carried sponsor flags in parades and the Rodeo numerous times. My husband and I currently serve meals to the cowboys, stock contractors, security and other personnel during the rodeo. We are always proud to get feedback from the participants about how beautiful Redding is. The cowboys mention how they went fishing, golfing or skiing on our beautiful lakes while they are in town. They mention how their families enjoy the peaceful community, walking trails, museums.
We typically attend the Wrangler National Finals Rodeo in Las Vegas and as we meet the professional cowboys, we mention that we are members of the rodeo association and their faces light up! "We love Redding Rodeo. You treat us so well", are typical responses. The Redding Rodeo has such a positive impact on many people from around the country.
Please continue supporting our rodeo by the river. And financially support improving our grounds for all to enjoy.

I’ve been a member with this rodeo association since 1973 and so many good changes have been made since way back when. John Balma had made an agreement with the City of Redding for a 99 year lease in 1948. Office fire had destroyed all the important papers pertaining to this matter. Seems this lease should be honored till the year 2047 as agreed. Redding Rodeo has improved the grounds every year and brings in a lot of revenue to the City of Redding. Many people enjoy a good rodeo and even it’s a first time experience. I would be see the rodeo remain where it is for the integrity of the Balma family and John Balma’s vision. John had done so much for Redding.

As a life long citizen and local businesses owner, I would state that we need the rodeo grounds and the amazing Asphalt Cowboys that are associated with it. Both the grounds and the Cowboys do so much for our community other then just a annual rodeo. Not only do they support their youth group they support their community as a whole. They were vital during the Carr and Camp fires as an evacuation zone and for finding supplies and food for the displaced animals.

I am a 1980 Redding Rodeo Queen. I have attended the Redding Rodeo for at least 50 years. I am also a life member of the Redding Women’s Rodeo Association. The Redding Rodeo is one of the oldest Events that continues to grow and bring more money to Redding every year. It is essential that the rodeo grounds stay in its current location and attain a long term lease so they are able to make the necessary improvements to continue its successful operations.

Please leave the rodeo grounds alone. They are an historic location that serves to bring together people from all walks of life in Redding and Shasta county .

I am writing in support of maintaining the Redding Rodeo grounds in its current location. The Redding Rodeo Association is a pillar of this community and always has been since it’s inception. My grandfather was a charter member of the Shasta County Sheriff Posse, now the Redding Rodeo Association. Any plans for the Riverfront Development must incorporate and prioritize the historic significance and economic benefit of protecting and preserving the current location of the Redding Rodeo Grounds.

How much revenue does this rodeo bring to the City of Redding and the local businesses? Please don't take this land for commercial development. What a shame that every inch of spare ground has to be commercially developed. What will be left for future generations? It's all about money! What a shame.

The rodeo grounds, formally known as the posse grounds has been in the current location for longer that the people that are trying to take it have been alive..they don't know or understand or care about the history of it..leave it alone, sign the 25 year lease and move on to something else, .like the homeless and crime problems.

Just a quick comment to say I’m all for the riverfront revitalization BUT I also support our wonderful Redding Rodeo staying right where it is. If it ever comes down to having to choose between the two, the Rodeo in its current location is going to get my vote. Thank you for listening to your residents!

a river walk, ala San Antonio?

Please keep the rodeo grounds where it is and provide a long term lease.

I fully support developing the Redding riverfront area into a multi-use area with retail, dining, parks, trails and performing arts center/sports venue. I think it is time to move the rodeo grounds as this beautiful riverfront area is not being showcased by the rodeo grounds. The riverfront is a gem and should be developed for our residents and tourists to enjoy.